下面引用由GoGoCat在 2004/11/14 04:19pm 發表的內容： I have to say that I can not agree with this article. All the so called "facts" are not having any proof at all. It's compelety insulte all the monks and nuns. The one who wrote ...
You have the right to disagree to and consider it bullshit, however, I also have the right to question your comprehension.
About 'facts', Bible has the same problem. Imagine the political influence being brought into it...
However, I do agree, it's too cynical to claim 神父修女和尚尼姑總是滿腦子 性欲. Not all, but probably quite some.
Actually, the main point is not sexuality of monks and nuns, but some kinds of religious belief and practice. Leading a life in monestary should be absolutely voluntary, yet who later return to the community of common people are usually oppressed....
Besides, the depersonification (and "sanctification") of Maria is another focus.
Well, Osho is such a controversial master.
GoGoCat
發表於： 2004/11/14 04:19pm
I have to say that I can not agree with this article. All the so called "facts" are not having any proof at all. It's compelety insulte all the monks and nuns. The one who wrote this article was having a big ego.
