下面引用由ANGUSKONG在 2005/10/26 05:39pm 發表的內容: There are so many "Spiritual Cources" nowaday, if you go into it , you will find out most of them are taken or copy part or some of the methodology from traditional religion such as Taoi ...
同意 二,三樓師兄,師姊的說話 小心走火入魔 一点淺見
gratia
發表於: 2005/10/26 09:16pm
下面引用由mensch在 2005/07/06 11:20pm 發表的內容: quote:
人體是一副運作程序和功能都早已被預定的機器。
今時今日大部分人都堅信這個錯誤的あ茠矕薑葽Q事不成,人生痛苦。
VERY TRUE~~~~~~
though i've strong quest for spirituality, i ...
同意 小心走火入魔 一点淺見
ANGUSKONG
發表於: 2005/10/26 05:39pm
There are so many "Spiritual Cources" nowaday, if you go into it , you will find out most of them are taken or copy part or some of the methodology from traditional religion such as Taoism or Buddism. Most of the new spiritual school ,only follow part of these religion method and contribute the teacher personal experiance into it.
However,these traditional religion there are come with a complete methodology and method of practising.
For example, many of these courses teaching visualisation , but what is the pre-requirement of learning visualisation ? Do they teach visualisation or imagination ? How do they distinguish betweem these two ? Please consider the serious consequence of getting into the wrong mind game.