-- 作者： stevie -- 發表時間： 2005/03/01 10:54am http://leold.yuensang.com/cgi-bin/topic.cgi?forum=65&topic=199 "[轉貼]哪些人有瘋狂性癖好?超愛SM!不爽就想報仇！ " don't u think it should be rephrased to decent wordings ??? Do you have a proper reason of referring such kind of article ??? is it the way you promote 術數 ???  :em35: -- 作者： keungyee -- 發表時間： 2005/03/01 11:38am 這課題的確令人懷疑及反感, 愛sm者極少, 登這段論句很易被人攻擊, 近十年有些所謂名師為了出位, 笑說發現同性恋,虐恋,��性恋等規律, 信他们才怪! :em09: -- 作者： 菜菜子 -- 發表時間： 2005/03/01 00:03pm [quote][b]下面引用由[u]stevie[/u]在 [i]2005/03/01 10:54am[/i] 發表的內容：[/b] http://leold.yuensang.com/cgi-bin/topic.cgi?forum=65&topic=199 "哪些人有瘋狂性癖好?超愛SM!不爽就想報仇！ " don't u think it should be rephrased to decent wordings ??? Do you have ... [/quote] 請問有什麼問題？ 是因為題目突出？ 但標題看不出有問題.... 還是術數不能說及性？ 性人人也有，再平常不過，為何要着重字眼？ 如果術數能知未婚夫另有性癖好，我可選擇不和他姞婚，而不用婚後才知道，那有多好. 現今太多不幸家庭，尤其是中國，中國人家醜不出外傳的思想引致太多家庭問題， 研究的心也失去如何自偁 " 研究" ？ 開天窗吧！ 要追及西方文明就等我們這一代，不要再給人說是發展中的國家了！ -- 作者： 菜菜子 -- 發表時間： 2005/03/01 00:06pm [quote][b]下面引用由[u]keungyee[/u]在 [i]2005/03/01 11:38am[/i] 發表的內容：[/b] 這課題的確令人懷疑及反感, 愛sm者極少, 登這段論句很易被人攻擊, 近十年有些所謂名師為了出位, 笑說發現同性恋,虐恋,��性恋等規律, 信他们才怪! [/quote] 少不表示沒有，請不要以一代三，你不是所有讀者！ -- 作者： stevie -- 發表時間： 2005/03/01 01:58pm [quote][b]下面引用由[u]菜菜子[/u]在 [i]2005/03/01 12:03pm[/i] 發表的內容：[/b] 請問有什麼問題？ 是因為題目突出？ 但標題看不出有問題.... 還是術數不能說及性？ 性人人也有，再平常不過，為何要着重字眼？ 如果術數能知未婚夫另有性癖好，我可選擇不和他姞婚，而不用婚後才知道，那　... [/quote] 1. keungyee said "這課題的確令人懷疑及反感". At least one pal also thinks in this way -- this article is 令人反感. 2. of course 術數能說及性 3. a. "為何要着重字眼" ? well, in the real world, *many* ppl concerns about the wordings they are using. It represents what they really want to express, and what they want you to know inside, to order to communicate, or persuade you.    b. related to previous point. if ppl is using foul languages to aid their expressions, what do u think? Those are only auxilliary words, they will defend in that way! 4. "如果術數能 ... " -- *IF*. See the point below. 5. in the article: " ... 最值得一提的是，根據經驗，凡是有天同、巨門、擎羊這三顆星在疾厄宮的人，極大多數都有很特殊的性癖好，提供給大家作參考。 " You think it's true??? The point mentioned is *highly* credible so that you are convinced it's talking about the truth? 6. a. Everyone has their moral standard (no matter what standard it is)     b. Everyone should have their social responsibility. It just happens that mine is different from you, which is pretty obvious. 7. How about we leave this to 緣生 to judge. This is his website anyway. He definitely has the right to have what kind of image he wants his website processes. 8. I know 緣生 is an expert in 紫微斗數. How about we ask him to judge the correctness of the controversal article here? -- 作者： stevie -- 發表時間： 2005/03/01 02:02pm [這篇文章最後由stevie在 2005/03/01 02:04pm 第 1 次編輯] [quote][b]下面引用由[u]菜菜子[/u]在 [i]2005/03/01 12:03pm[/i] 發表的內容：[/b] 請問有什麼問題？ 是因為題目突出？ 但標題看不出有問題.... ... [/quote] [quote][b]下面引用由[u]菜菜子[/u]在 [i]2005/03/01 12:06pm[/i] 發表的內容：[/b] 少不表示沒有，請不要以一代三，[b]你不是所有讀者！[/b] [/quote] interesting ...